Blog

Review of A Story of Sorrow by Daniel J. Volpe

Very few writers can claim to have not only coined the term for a new, emergent genre but also produced an exemplar of the form. However, Daniel J. Volpe is one such writer. In voicing the words “Splatter-Fantasy”, Volpe has opened the doors to a whole new realm of fantasy literature with a dark edge, as well as recategorising many extant works that previously eluded easy attempts at definition.

While Grimdark has been around for a while—indeed, Volpe cites a few masters of Grimdark in his dedications, such as Abercrombie—it tends to focus on blood, politics, and betrayal. There’s plenty of that in A Story of Sorrow. But there’s also something else, something undeniably weird. The closest parallel to what Volpe is doing in A Story of Sorrow is the baroque masterpiece BleakWarrior, a novel described as “Sword & Debauchery” but which fits into the new paradigm of Splatter-Fantasy. What sets these books apart from Grimdark or standard Dark Fantasy works is their ability to incorporate horror into the fantastical and magical elements, to unflinchingly pursue their inquiry into the dark side of existence even into realms beyond the real.

However, as fascinated as I am by this new genre, I don’t want to get sidetracked and neglect to talk about A Story of Sorrow itself.

A Story of Sorrow is a Robert E. Howard-esque episodic series (at the time of writing, there are three entries) that captures the magic of watching old fantasy television programmes such as Xena, Warrior Princess, only Volpe’s world and characters are a good deal darker than even Xena’s blackest adventures. The books are short and sweet (whichagain makes them feel like an hour-long television special, rather than a two or three hour film). And each one is self-contained, though of course if you do read the books in order, a deeper and darker plot begins to emerge, tying together the narrative threads woven through each book.

I had such a good time with this series. Simply put, A Story of Sorrow is so much fun, the most fun I have had with a fantasy series in a good long while. Rather than bogging himself down in world-building and magic systems, Volpe understands that it’s the characters who make a great tale.

Enter our hero, the aptly named Sorrow, a former gladiatorial blade-master turned galley-slave. We first meet Sorrow in book 1, Of Flesh and Blood, chained to the oars of a ship being torn apart by a black storm. I knew I would like him when he turns to Hame, one of the slavers who has just lashed him, and remarks, “You would strike a man when he wasn’t looking, but I already knew that… then again, you’re a cunt.” These are Sorrow’s first lines of dialogue. Character established.

The opening sequence sets the tone of the entire series, as the slave-masters desperately try to whip the galley-slaves into saving the sinking ship, and the divine hand of providence wreaks untold fury upon them. Only the strongest wills survive. The rest become “gull shit”.

From there, we meet a cast of horrible but lovable (and perhaps lovable because they are so horrible) side characters: Jagrim, an axe-wielding mercenary with a taste for whores and rot-gut. Gortul, another mercenary, a little more grounded than Jagrim, but just as deadly with his mace. Then there’s the sneaky, slip of a boy, Finleos, who looks a little bit too similar to Sorrow for comfort... And, a personal favourite: Zakkas, who comes from the Land of Burning Sands, wields a scimitar, and is forever taking the piss out of his pale-skinned companions. It’s a classic fantasy set-up of “men on mission”, with lots of crude banter and insults and violent killing, but it’s done with pathos, humour, and heart. You sense that despite the brutality of this world—or perhaps because of it—Volpe cares about his characters and what they are going through, and he makes you care about them too.

And, often times, just when we think we have the measure of a character, Volpe turns matters on their head. A good example of this is Vicar Prentas in the first book. We spend most of the book hating the officious idiot, viewing him through Sorrow’s admittedly biased lens—he has no love of the Church—but at the end of the story information comes to light that changes the way we perceive Prentas and makes us question Sorrow’s unbridled criticism of the Church. Likewise, we grow fond of certain characters, only for them to commit heinous acts that makes us question how far we can sympathise with them. This makes the characters feel alive.

Despite my saying Volpe doesn’t bog us down with world-building, there is a really fascinating world here. Volpe doesn’t try to reveal all of it in one go—a classic error many fantasy writers make—but instead gradually unveils its politics, its religious divides, its magic, and its cities and territories. It’s world full of ruthless cut-throats, seedy taverns, whorehouses where the odds of ending up dead or plague-ridden by the end of the night are extremely high, black magic rites, and fights to the death either for vendetta or amusement. It’s also a world full of mysterious creatures that are just left of the predictable fantasy tropes. In the second book, for example, our antiheroes find themselves being hunted in the mountains by a horrific six-eyed monster awoken in the bowels of a cave. The creature is so old and so nightmarish that it is never even given a name. No one knows what the hell it is, which makes it five times scarier.

The final two things I would like to say about the series are this. Firstly, Volpe really understands the concept of “pay off”. He places a Chekhov’s Guns on the table in his openings, and invariably they fire in the second half of the book in interesting ways. Sometimes, you can see how the plots are going to dovetail, but that isn’t a criticism—the plot becomes inevitable, which gives it riptide power to pull you on, turning pages without breathing. I found myself in awe of the way that certain narratives would converge in order to advance the story, and even more awed when the outcome was not what I expected.

Secondly, Volpe really has a gift for prose. His prose is precise and fluid and—perhaps because he is a horror writer—he has this knack for making certain images suddenly jump out at you. No book is perfect, of course, and there were one or two small anachronisms that threw me out of the fantasy world (I am sorry, but I am a stickler for things like this!). However, these hardly matter when paired with sentences as evocative and gorgeous as this opening line to book 1:

“It rode into town on the back of a dead horse, wearing a cloak of human flesh.”

Or, this throat-constricting scene from the opening of book 2:

“She clawed, trying to reach his face with her long, dirty nails. Fesha hooked a chain around his neck, pulling forth a shimmering amulet from his shirt. The metal was mirrored finish and, in its reflection, Fesha glimpsed fear in her eyes. It was the last thing she’d ever see.”

Overall, A Story of Sorrow is a really unique approach to writing fantasy—combining old school sword and sorcery with twisted, gut-wrenching horror and delivering it in a slim, episodic format. I found myself totally immersed in the tale and sad when I had finished the third book that there was no more (and also sad because the ending of book 3 is horrific and I mean that in a good way). Here’s hoping that Volpe releases book 4 soon. Until then, I’ll be killing time drinking gut-rot in the taverns of Ayr.

You can find out more information, or purchase copies, of A Story of Sorrow here:

Amazon UK

Amazon US

Blog

Review of In The Shadow of Their Dying by Anna Smith Spark and Michael R. Fletcher

In esoteric philosophy, it takes the combination of two polarised energetic forces in order to produce something new and original. The most obvious example of this is found in conception and childbirth. But the same applies in the intellectual and imaginative realms as well.

In The Shadow of Their Dying is one such original creation, sprung from the union of two giants of fantasy: Michael R. Fletcher, known as the Mad Titan of dark fantasy (what an epithet!), and Anna Smith Spark, Queen of Grimdark.

Having read both of these authors, I have to admit I was uncertain how their styles would effectively combine. Michael R. Fletcher writes in a stark and cerebral manner. His work explores powerful concepts and, at least in my view, seems primarily concerned with ideas. For example, in Beyond Redemption, his world is populated by Geisteskranken, individuals whose delusions are so powerful they manifest in physical reality. Fletcher uses this high-concept premise to explore the dark recesses of the human mind and our relationship with religion and belief. In many ways, his novel read to me like an allegorical tale, in which characters embody particular human delusions or desires or false beliefs. In this way, his work has a distinctly Spenserian vein.

By contrast, Anna Smith Spark’s epic Empires of Dust series is written in a deeply emotive and impressionistic style. Her story is not centred around precise plotting or logically worked out magic systems, but rather on the torrid and tumultuous emotional interiors of her characters; its these emotions, more than anything else, that drive them and the action. I compared Empires of Dust to The Iliad in my original review because, like Homer’s masterwork, it is the furyof Achilles that takes centre stage, not the politics of Troy and Greece.

My fears about how two such differing styles would combine were unfounded, however. In fact, the abilities each author brought to the table augmented and complimented the other beautifully. Fletcher’s sheer bleakness was lifted by Anna Smith Spark’s incredibly lush and stylish poetry. And conversely, Spark’s more abstract approach to narrative—which at times can be hard to follow—was grounded by Fletcher’s more concrete and direct approach, as well as beingilluminated by his jet black humour. Although it must be said both writers introduce comedy into their dark narratives in surprising ways.

But enough meditations on writing style. I should get to the plot!

In The Shadow of Their Dying is a story about three characters caught up in the midst of a terrible and pointless war. Though there are a host of players in the tale, our main protagonists are: the hapless yet cunning Tash, the “third best assassin in Sharaam”; Pitt, the leader of a curious gang of cutthroats and magical beings; and finally, Iananr, a demon bound in service to the King of Sharaam.

Clive Barker once wrote in his masterpiece Imajica that:

“It was the pivotal teaching of Pluthero Quexos, the most celebrated dramatist of the Second Dominion, that in any fiction, no matter how ambitious its scope or profound its theme, there was only ever room for three players. Between warring kings, a peacemaker; between adoring spouses, a seducer or a child. Between twins, the spirit of the womb. Between lovers, Death. Greater numbers might drift through the drama, of course – thousands in fact – but they could only ever be phantoms, agents, or, on rare occasions, reflections of the three real and self-willed beings who stood at the center.”

This is certainly true of In The Shadow of Their Dying, for it is these three players that constantly drive the action with their alliances and betrayals, their rises to power and subsequent falls, their changes of heart, and their reversions to their darker natures. Each perspective is unique. Tash is a strangely relateable narcissist who wants people to take him seriously and will do anything to ensure that. Pitt is an experienced manipulator who yet has a weak-spot for one woman in particular. And Iananr is perhaps the most fascinating perspective of all: she is a demon bound to human form, and her mind roves in ways that are utterly alien and almost incomprehensible to us.

In the structuring and styling of the story, both writers play to their strengths. It’s clear Anna Smith Spark handled the chapters written from the perspective of Iananr, using her gorgeously sensuous prose to conjure the unknowable thoughts and feelings of a being that is not truly of the flesh but of the spirit. At times, the writing almost becomes pure poetry, grammar and words bent out of all shape and recognition as they strain to evoke the labyrinthine mind of a creature that is more god than mortal. This is doubly appropriate, because it is with “words-chains”—a spell—that the demon is bound, and the demon is constantly meditating on the inadequacy and yet the hidden power of words.

By contrast, it’s clear Fletcher leant his hand to Tash’s chapters, his grimdark sensibilities rendering our assassin in delightful shades of morally grey. Tash is a loathsome human being, but strangely compelling. Comedy is interspersed with bloodshed and morally reprehensible acts in an almost Shakespearean fashion. The ultimate fate our assassin ishilarious and darkly fitting.

In The Shadow of Their Dying is only a novella, so the plot is neither grand nor sweeping. All the action takes place within the city walls of Sharaam. But this serves to up the tension and enhance the focus even further on the characters; in this way, the book feels almost like a play, and fittingly Tash wistfully reflects upon his own life as a play being written by a great playwright. Spark and Fletcher have created a darkly vibrant world despite the fact we only see a taster of it. They also take a few old tropes of the fantasy genre and remake them in gloriously inventive ways. Despite the plot not being the main focus of the story, there are a few wonderful surprises in store that will catch you unawares.

If I have one minor criticism, it is at times scenes are repeated from a different character’s perspective a few too many times for my taste, especially for a novella of this size. But this is a minor quibble, and the murky atmosphere of the story is sustained throughout.

In The Shadow of Their Dying is a gore-soaked, betrayal-filled, grimdark delight that yet hides a strangely spiritual core. It asks the question of what ties truly bind us to a life of misery, war, bloodshed, and addiction, and whether those ties might really be an illusion, and what might happen if we could free ourselves of those ties. The answers are not predictable, nor expected. And the characters we think are capable of redemption may, after all, be doomed to repeat their mistakes. And the characters we believe are irredeemable may yet surprise us.

I, for one, hope that we see another book from these two masters of the craft. A few threads have been left which could be used to weave a larger narrative. But even if we don’t see more, In The Shadow of Their Dying is a perfectly blendedshot of dark fantasy that burns the throat on the way down, and leaves an aftertaste as beautifully bitter as it is sweet.

You can purchase the novella here:

Amazon UK

Amazon US